Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transponder charges paid to the non-resident recipient were sums chargeable to tax in India so as to attract deduction of tax at source under section 195 and consequent treatment of the assessee as an assessee in default under section 201(1) and liability to interest under section 201(1A).
Analysis: The payment for transponder capacity had already been considered in earlier decisions concerning the same recipient, where it was held that such receipts were not chargeable to tax in India in the hands of the non-resident. Following the principle that the obligation to deduct tax at source arises only when the remittance is a sum chargeable under the Act, the absence of taxability in the recipient's hands meant that the payer could not be fastened with withholding liability. Once the underlying sum was held not taxable, the characterisation of the payment as royalty did not sustain the TDS demand or the default order.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. No tax was deductible at source on the transponder charges, and the assessee could not be treated as an assessee in default under sections 201(1) and 201(1A).
Ratio Decidendi: The obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195 arises only when the payment is chargeable to tax in the hands of the non-resident recipient; if the sum is not so chargeable, no withholding liability and no consequent default under section 201 can be imposed.