Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the applicant is an educational institution within clause 2(y) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017. (ii) Whether the applicant is eligible for exemption under Entry 66(a) of the said notification.
Issue (i): Whether the applicant is an educational institution within clause 2(y) of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28/06/2017.
Analysis: The applicant was held to fall within the definition because, under the Indian Institutes of Management Act, 2017, it was empowered to grant degrees, diplomas and other academic distinctions and the education provided by it was treated as education leading to qualifications recognised by law for the time being in force. The authority accepted that the statutory status conferred on the institute brought its activities within the notified definition.
Conclusion: The applicant is an educational institution within clause 2(y).
Issue (ii): Whether the applicant is eligible for exemption under Entry 66(a) of the said notification.
Analysis: Once the applicant was found to be an educational institution, its services were held to answer the description in Entry 66(a). The authority also accepted that where more than one exemption is lawfully available, the assessee may claim the more beneficial one, and held that the general educational exemption was available notwithstanding the specific entry relating to IIM services.
Conclusion: The applicant is eligible for exemption under Entry 66(a).
Final Conclusion: The ruling grants the applicant the benefit of the educational-institution exemption and recognises its status for GST exemption purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an institute is statutorily empowered to award qualifications recognised by law, it falls within the notified definition of educational institution and may claim the corresponding exemption if the conditions of the notification are otherwise satisfied.