Assessee's Appeal Partially Allowed: Travel & Salary Expenses Disallowed, Mark-Up on Software Sales Remanded

The tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. It ordered the deletion of disallowances concerning travelling and salary expenses while remanding the matter of the mark-up on software sales back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Disallowance of Rs. 11,97,000/- in travelling expenses.
2. Disallowance of Rs. 24,70,578/- in salary expenses.
3. Addition of Rs. 32 Lakhs as mark-up on sales of software under Section 92 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Rs. 11,97,000/- in Travelling Expenses:

The assessee claimed travelling expenses amounting to Rs. 29,95,103/-, which included foreign travel and training expenses. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed 50% of these expenses, amounting to Rs. 14,97,550/-, on the grounds that some expenses were personal and some were capital in nature. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] upheld the disallowance but corrected the amount to Rs. 11,97,000/-, noting that the actual expenditure was Rs. 23.95 lakhs. The tribunal observed that the assessee provided complete details of the expenses and that the AO did not point out any specific defects. The tribunal concluded that the disallowance was based on conjectures and surmises without concrete evidence and ordered the deletion of the disallowance. The assessee succeeded on this ground.

2. Disallowance of Rs. 24,70,578/- in Salary Expenses:

The AO disallowed 20% of the salary expenses, amounting to Rs. 24,70,578/-, on the grounds that the salary expenses were disproportionately high compared to the income. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting that the assessee failed to demonstrate that the entire expenditure was meant for business purposes. The tribunal observed that the assessee provided complete details of the employees and salary expenses, and the genuineness of the salary payments was not doubted by the Revenue. The tribunal held that no disallowance was warranted as the disallowance was made without any comparative analysis or specific defects. The tribunal ordered the deletion of the disallowance, deciding this issue in favor of the assessee.

3. Addition of Rs. 32 Lakhs as Mark-up on Sales of Software under Section 92:

The AO added Rs. 32 Lakhs as a 10% mark-up on the sale of software, which the assessee had purchased from its foreign parent company for Rs. 3.2 crores and sold to HCL Technologies Ltd. at the same price. The assessee contended that no mark-up was added as there was no value addition by the assessee. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, noting that the assessee failed to provide evidence that the software was to be delivered on a cost-to-cost basis as per any agreement or direction from the parent company. The tribunal observed that the assessee did not place complete details and evidence on record to support its claim. The tribunal restored the matter back to the AO for a denovo determination, directing the assessee to provide all necessary evidence and explanations. This ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

Conclusion:

The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. The tribunal ordered the deletion of disallowances related to travelling and salary expenses and remanded the issue of the mark-up on software sales back to the AO for fresh consideration.

---