Disinfectant classification under tax law: products primarily killing germs fall in the specific entry, not the residuary entry.

Disinfectant classification under the U.P. VAT Act was tested by common parlance, technical meaning, expert reports, and earlier decisions. Harpic and Lizol were treated as disinfectants capable of killing germs and microorganisms, and that character was not lost because they also cleaned surfaces. The Court applied the rule that a specific taxing entry must be preferred over the residuary entry where the goods satisfy that entry, and held that the Revenue had not shown the products fell outside Entry 20 of Part A of Schedule II. The goods were therefore classified under the specific entry, not the residuary entry.

---

---

Issues: Whether Harpic and Lizol were classifiable under Entry 20 of Part A of Schedule II to the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 as pesticides or insecticides, or were exigible to tax under the residuary entry.

Analysis: The products were held to be disinfectants with the capacity to kill germs and microorganisms. Reliance was placed on expert test reports, the commercial and technical meaning of disinfectant, the treatment of similar products in earlier decisions, and the principle that classification in a taxing statute must first be tested against the specific entry before resort is made to the residuary entry. The Court accepted that products used primarily as disinfectants do not lose that character merely because they also clean surfaces, and that the Revenue had not discharged the burden of showing that the goods fell outside the specific entry.

Conclusion: Harpic and Lizol were held to fall within Entry 20 of Part A of Schedule II to the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008, and not within the residuary entry.

Ratio Decidendi: A product whose essential character is that of a disinfectant capable of killing germs may be classified as a pesticide or insecticide under the specific taxing entry, and the residuary entry cannot be invoked where the specific entry is satisfied on common parlance, technical, and expert evidence.

---