Tribunal directs deletion of disallowances under Section 14A & 36(1)(iii)

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A and the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii). The issue of interest paid on LIC loans was remitted to the AO for fresh verification and determination. The order was pronounced in the open court on 05.10.2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of expenses under Section 14A.
2. Allowability of interest paid on LIC loans.
3. Diversion of funds by way of interest-free loans and advances to relatives and sister concerns.

Detailed Analysis:

First Issue: Disallowance of Expenses under Section 14A

The assessee, engaged in trading Futures & Options and commission agents, received dividend income of Rs. 2,07,884/- claimed as exempt. The AO disallowed Rs. 1,50,230/- under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, attributing it to the average investments in shares. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, stating the business was composite and indivisible, thus necessitating the disallowance as per Rule 8D. The Tribunal, however, observed that the assessee's own capital was Rs. 11.40 crores, and the claimed expenses were minimal compared to the scale of operations. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 1,50,230/- under Section 14A, accepting the assessee's claim of Rs. 8,100/- as business expenses.

Second Issue: Allowability of Interest Paid on LIC Loans

The AO disallowed the adjustment of interest paid on LIC loans against interest income from the partnership firm, M/s Ritesh Exports. The CIT(A) did not address this issue in its order, leading the assessee to file a rectification application, which was dismissed. The Tribunal noted the confusion in the AO's computation of income and admitted the grounds of appeal regarding the disallowance of interest expenditure on LIC loans. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the AO for verification of the direct nexus between the LIC loans and the investment in the partnership firm, directing a fresh determination of the issue.

Third Issue: Diversion of Funds by Way of Interest-Free Loans and Advances

The AO observed that the assessee advanced Rs. 46.91 lacs as interest-free loans to relatives and sister concerns while paying interest on borrowed funds. The AO disallowed Rs. 4,22,202/- under Section 36(1)(iii), which was upheld by the CIT(A). The Tribunal, however, noted that the assessee had sufficient own funds of Rs. 11.40 crores and interest-free borrowings of Rs. 1.21 crores. Citing the presumption that the assessee used its own funds for interest-free advances, the Tribunal referred to the decisions in Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. and HDFC Bank Limited, concluding that the disallowance was unsustainable and ordered its deletion.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the disallowance under Section 14A and the disallowance of interest expenditure under Section 36(1)(iii). The issue of interest paid on LIC loans was remitted to the AO for fresh verification and determination. The order was pronounced in the open court on 05.10.2018.

---