Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains arising from the joint development arrangement were chargeable in the assessment year 2010-11 and whether the reassessment made on that basis was sustainable.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the point of transfer in a development agreement. The recorded facts showed that the original agreement was entered into in 2000, but the developer could obtain actual vacant possession only in 2003 after the occupants were vacated. The addition sought to be made for assessment year 2010-11 was founded mainly on the developer's letter stating that the construction was ready for occupation, even though the construction was not in terms of the development agreement and the dispute remained subject to litigation. Applying the principle that capital gains arise when possession is actually handed over so that the transaction satisfies the ingredients of transfer under Section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, the later year adopted by the revenue was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The capital gains could not be taxed in assessment year 2010-11, and the reassessment based on that premise was unsustainable.