Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (10) TMI 291 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s order allowing deductions for R&D machine and road construction expenses. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s order, allowing deductions for the advance paid for the R&D machine and the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal upholds CIT(A)'s order allowing deductions for R&D machine and road construction expenses.

                            The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s order, allowing deductions for the advance paid for the R&D machine and the expenditure on road construction. The Tribunal emphasized interpreting tax provisions liberally to promote research and development activities.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether advance paid for acquiring research equipment can be considered as expenditure incurred for Research & Development under Section 35(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Whether the assessee is entitled to a deduction of Rs. 1,35,96,001 under Section 35(1)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the machine was not acquired during the year.
                            3. Whether the expenditure of Rs. 17,86,515 for constructing external roads to the factory premises is permissible as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the ownership remains with the government.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Advance Paid for Acquiring Research Equipment:
                            - The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) wrongly allowed the deduction under Section 35(1) as there was no expenditure incurred for research and development during the year.
                            - The assessee contended that under Section 35(1)(iv) read with Section 35(2)(ia), the term "incurred" is broader than "put to use" or "acquisition of capital asset." The assessee cited the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Nainital Bank Ltd., which explained that "expenditure" denotes spending or paying out.
                            - The assessee paid Rs. 1,35,96,001 as an advance for a customized R&D machine, which was shown as capital work in progress. The machine was delivered and installed in the subsequent financial year.
                            - The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the advance represented a substantial amount of the total cost and was non-refundable, thus constituting expenditure incurred for R&D. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, distinguishing it from the Kerala High Court's decision in TCM Ltd. vs. CIT.

                            2. Entitlement to Deduction under Section 35(1)(iv):
                            - The Revenue contended that the deduction should be allowed in the year the machine was delivered, not when the payment was made.
                            - The assessee relied on judicial pronouncements, including decisions from the Madras High Court, Delhi High Court, Karnataka High Court, and Gujarat High Court, which held that acquisition and installation of the R&D machine is not a prerequisite for allowing deduction under Section 35(1)(iv).
                            - The Tribunal noted that the total cost of the machine was Rs. 1,53,72,083, and the advance represented a substantial part of this cost. The advance was paid to secure a customized machine, and the terms did not allow for cancellation or refund.
                            - The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the expenditure was incurred for R&D and was allowable under Section 35(1)(iv), even if the machine was delivered and installed in the next financial year.

                            3. Expenditure for Constructing External Roads:
                            - The Revenue argued that the expenditure for constructing external roads should be treated as capital expenditure since the ownership remained with the government.
                            - The assessee contended that the road construction was necessary for business operations and relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Travancore Cochin Chemical Ltd vs. CIT, which distinguished between new road construction and repair/strengthening of existing roads.
                            - The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the expenditure was for strengthening an existing road, not constructing a new one, and that the road's ownership remained with the government.
                            - The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, allowing the expenditure as a revenue deduction under Section 37(1).

                            Conclusion:
                            - The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the CIT(A)'s order, allowing the deductions claimed by the assessee for the advance paid for the R&D machine and the expenditure on road construction. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of interpreting tax provisions liberally to encourage research and development activities.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found