TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal dismisses rectification application due to lack of specific decisions in records.</h1> <h3>Arrow Engineers Versus Commissioner of Central Excise Thane II</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in the order due to the absence of specific decisions in the ... Rectification of Mistake - Rectification sought on the ground that the oral submission pertaining to applicability of the decision mentioned have not been considered while deciding the matter and that, in paragraph 10 of the said order, there is reference to terminal duties which was not the issue in dispute. Held that:- On a perusal of the file, there is no record of such submission or reference to the said decision. Learned Authorised Representative contends that the issue pertaining to paragraph 10 of the order does not find a place in the application - the application for rectification of mistakes is dismissed. The application for rectification of mistake in the order was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai as the oral submissions regarding specific decisions were not found in the records, and the issue mentioned was not part of the application.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
