Appellate Court Convicts Accused in Cheque Case: Simple Imprisonment, Fines, Compensation

The appellate court convicted the 3rd accused in a case involving dishonored cheques issued by the accused company, sentencing him to six months of Simple Imprisonment for each case, with concurrent sentences. The accused were also fined and ordered to pay compensation to the complainant. The court held that the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act were not rebutted by the accused, emphasizing their failure to provide evidence to disprove the complainant's case. The court clarified that the company's winding up and the death of the Managing Director did not absolve it of liability under the N.I. Act.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the cheques issued by the accused company were supported by consideration.
2. Whether the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I. Act) was rebutted by the accused.
3. The impact of the death of the 2nd accused and the winding up of the respondent’s company on the liability under the N.I. Act.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether the cheques issued by the accused company were supported by consideration:

The complainant company, engaged in money lending for vehicle and machinery purchases, entered into a Hire Purchase Agreement with the accused company. The accused issued several cheques towards the installment of the loan amount. However, the cheques were dishonored with the endorsement "Refer to Drawer." The complainant issued a statutory legal notice, to which the accused did not respond. The accused contended that the cheques were issued for security purposes and not supported by consideration as no loan was actually disbursed. The trial court acquitted the accused, holding that the cheques were not supported by consideration.

2. Whether the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act was rebutted by the accused:

The appellate court noted that the accused did not deny the execution of the cheques or the Hire Purchase Agreement (Ex-R1). The court emphasized that under Section 118(a) of the N.I. Act, it is presumed that every negotiable instrument was made for consideration, and under Section 139, it is presumed that the holder of a cheque received it for the discharge of a debt or liability. The court referenced the Supreme Court judgment in Hiten P. Dalal vs. Bratindranath Banerjee, which clarified that these presumptions place the evidential burden on the accused to prove otherwise. The appellate court found that the accused failed to rebut these presumptions as they did not provide a plausible explanation or documentary evidence to disprove the complainant's case. The accused's mere denial and failure to reply to the statutory notice were insufficient to rebut the presumption of consideration.

3. The impact of the death of the 2nd accused and the winding up of the respondent’s company on the liability under the N.I. Act:

During the pendency of the appeals, the 2nd accused died, and the appeals against him abated. Additionally, the respondent's company was wound up, and an Official Liquidator was appointed. The court held that the winding up of the company and the death of the Managing Director did not absolve the company of its liability under the N.I. Act. The court emphasized that the company, represented by the 3rd accused (another Director), remained liable for the proceedings. The N.I. Act, being a self-contained law, ensures that the liability persists despite the company's liquidation or the death of its Managing Director.

Conclusion:

The appellate court allowed the criminal appeals, convicting the 3rd accused and sentencing him to six months of Simple Imprisonment for each case, with the sentences to run concurrently. The accused were also ordered to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000 in each case and compensation to the complainant as specified in the tabular column. The court reiterated that the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act favored the complainant and that the trial court erred in not appreciating the total circumstances and legal aspects surrounding the case.

---