Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal upholds deduction for interest income of agricultural credit societies under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).</h1> <h3>The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 5 And Ward-3, Thiruvalla, Alappuzha And Alappuzha Versus M/s. The Ithithanam Janatha Service Cooperative Bank, M/s. Parayakkad Service Co-operative Bank Limited, M/s. Cherthala Government ServantsService Co-operative Bank Limited, Limited And M/s. Alappuzha Government Servants’ Cooperative Bank Limited</h3> The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 5 And Ward-3, Thiruvalla, Alappuzha And Alappuzha Versus M/s. The Ithithanam Janatha Service Cooperative Bank, M/s. ... Issues Involved:1. Whether the CIT(A) is justified in directing the Assessing Officer to grant deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act in respect of interest income received by the assessee on investments made with Sub-Treasuries, Banks, etc.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for Interest Income:The primary issue in these appeals is whether the CIT(A) was correct in directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act for interest income received by the assessee from investments made with Sub-Treasuries and Banks.Facts of the Case:The assessees are primary agricultural credit societies registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, engaged in banking and providing credit facilities to their members. For the assessment years under consideration, the Assessing Officer treated the interest income received from investments with treasury and banks as income from other sources, thereby denying the claim of deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).CIT(A)'s Decision:The CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessees, following the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Kizhathadiyoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. for the assessment year 2009-2010. The CIT(A) held that the interest income earned on investments made with Treasury and Banks is part of the banking activity of the assessee and thus eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).Revenue's Appeal:The Revenue contested CIT(A)'s decision, arguing that the CIT(A) erred in holding that the interest earned from investments in treasury and banks is part of banking activity eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Revenue cited the Supreme Court's decision in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd., which held that such interest income should be classified as 'income from other sources' taxable under Section 56 and not qualify for deduction as business income under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).Tribunal's Analysis:The Tribunal considered various judicial pronouncements, including:- CIT v. Karnataka State Co-operative Bank [251 ITR 194 (SC)]- Vaveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd. v CIT [(2017) 396 ITR 371 (Telangana and Andhra Pradesh High Court)]- Muttom Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITA No.372/Coch/2010)- Mundakkayam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITA No.106/Coch/2016)- The Mangalam Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (ITA No.495/Coch/2017)The Tribunal noted that the Cochin Bench had previously considered an identical issue in the case of The Azhikode Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Others, deciding in favor of the assessees. It was established that a primary agricultural credit society or a primary cooperative agricultural and rural development bank, which does not possess a license from the Reserve Bank of India to carry on banking business, is not a cooperative bank as per Section 80P(4) of the Act. Therefore, such societies are eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).Distinguishing Totgar's Case:The Tribunal distinguished the Supreme Court's decision in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd., noting that in Totgar's, the interest income was from investments of sale proceeds retained by the society, which was shown as a liability. In contrast, in the present case, the interest income was from the society's own funds invested in the course of its banking activities.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessees, being primary agricultural credit societies engaged in providing credit facilities to their members, are entitled to deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest income received from investments made with Sub-Treasuries and Banks. The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed.Order:The appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed, and the CIT(A)'s direction to grant the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) is upheld.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found