Court centralizes investigations, orders common approach for Show Cause Notices, reserves parties' rights.

The Court granted the petitioner's request for common investigations due to inconveniences from separate local investigations. It noted the petitioner's cooperation issues and ordered a senior officer to review evidence to determine if a common approach was needed before issuing Show Cause Notices. The Court centralized the adjudication of SCNs to be handled by one officer in Delhi, excluding the interim order period from the limitation period for issuing SCNs. All parties' rights were reserved, and the writ petition was disposed of.

---

---

Issues:
1. Request for common investigations by the petitioner due to inconveniences caused by separate investigations at different locations.
2. Dispute regarding cooperation in investigations by the petitioner as per the letter addressed to the Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax.
3. Consideration of the nature of investigations and evidence gathered in M/s. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. for determining the necessity of a common approach.
4. Decision on centralizing the adjudication of Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued by competent authorities in different zones to be handled by one officer in Delhi.

Analysis:

1. The petitioner sought directions for common investigations due to inconveniences caused by separate local investigations conducted at different locations. The Court noted that separate investigations had been carried out at Ahmedabad, Chandigarh, Chennai, and Pune, leading to the petitioner's claim of being inconvenienced.

2. The Revenue contended that the petitioner was not cooperating in the investigations as per a letter addressed to the Chief Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax. The letter highlighted the petitioner's refusal to provide records citing the High Court's order and a request for a common investigator, resulting in a stalemate in the investigations.

3. The Court examined the nature of investigations in M/s. Lemon Tree Hotels Ltd. and the information gathered, determining that the evidence collected was of a different kind. While the petitioner sought general directions for common investigations, the Court deemed it inappropriate at that stage. Instead, it was decided that a senior officer or Commissioner would review the evidence later to ascertain if a common approach was necessary before concluding the investigations and issuing Show Cause Notices (SCNs).

4. Regarding the centralization of adjudication of SCNs, the Court ordered that after the issuance of SCNs by competent authorities in different zones, the Chief Commissioners of Central Goods and Services Tax would pass an order centralizing the adjudication to be handled by one competent officer in Delhi. This officer would be empowered to deal with all SCNs from different zones, streamlining the adjudication process.

In conclusion, the Court clarified that the period during which the interim order operated would be excluded from computing the limitation period for issuing SCNs. All rights and contentions of the parties were reserved, and the writ petition was disposed of accordingly.

---