Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 1/2006-ST despite exclusion of the value of material used in providing erection, commissioning and installation services.
Analysis: The exemption was denied on the ground that the appellant had not satisfied the notification conditions. On the records, the bill raised by the appellant showed installation charges only, while the purchase order reflected supply of roofing sheets and other material without inclusion of their value in the billed amount. The omission of material value amounted to breach of the exemption condition, and the Tribunal found it unnecessary to examine the CENVAT credit objection once this violation was established.
Conclusion: The appellant was not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/2006-ST and the exemption claim failed.