Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether shipping bills could be amended after export under section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the basis of documents already in existence, and whether the appellant was the exporter entitled to the export benefits.
Analysis: The relevant documents, including the contract, bill of lading, invoices and no-objection certificate, showed that the goods were exported by the appellant, even though the transaction was routed through a merchant exporter. The documents relied upon were in existence at the time of export, satisfying the requirement for post-export amendment under section 149. In such a situation, the exporter of the goods is entitled to the export benefits, and a disclaimer certificate may be obtained from the merchant exporter to avoid misuse.
Conclusion: The amendment of the shipping bills was permissible and the appellant was entitled to be treated as the exporter for the relevant export benefits.
Final Conclusion: The impugned rejection was set aside and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: A shipping bill may be amended after export under section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 when the amendment is supported by documentary evidence already in existence at the time of export, and export benefits belong to the exporter.