Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellant wins service tax dispute, penalties set aside, entitled to refund.</h1> <h3>M/s. Saurashtra Gramin Bank Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & ST, Rajkot</h3> The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside penalties and demands for an extended period while allowing them to pursue a refund for the ... Banking and Financial services - appellant was working as an agent of SBI Life and receiving commission of such sells - N/N. 30/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012 read with Section 68(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 2(1)(d)(i)(A) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Held that:- The appellant was not required to pay service tax on Insurance Agent service in terms of N/N. 30/2012-ST dated 26.02.2012. However, the service recipient i.e. SBI Life is liable to pay service tax on reverse charge mechanism. CENVAT Credit - input service - Insurance Agent service provided by the appellant in the capacity of service provider - Held that:- The service tax was paid on the output service therefore, the credit in respect of output service cannot be taken as per CENVAT Credit Rules. Therefore, the appellant are not entitled for Cenvat credit since they were not liable to pay service tax. Extended period of limitation - Held that:- Since the appellant have paid the service tax on 100% value and availed 50% credit, even though they were not liable to pay, no malafide intention on the part of the appellant. In such a case, demand for the longer period and penalties are not sustainable. Appeal allowed in part. Issues: Liability of service tax on insurance agent services, entitlement to Cenvat credit, refund of service tax paid inadvertently, applicability of penaltiesLiability of service tax on insurance agent services:The case revolved around the liability of the appellant, a banking and financial services entity, to pay service tax on the commission received from selling insurance products as an agent of SBI Life Insurance. The appellant mistakenly paid service tax on the commission and availed Cenvat credit. The department contended that the service provided by the appellant as an insurance agent was an output service, making them ineligible for Cenvat credit. However, it was established that the appellant was not required to pay service tax on insurance agent services as per relevant notifications. The responsibility to pay service tax lay with the service recipient, SBI Life Insurance, under the reverse charge mechanism.Entitlement to Cenvat credit:The appellant argued that they should not be liable to pay service tax since they had already paid tax on 100% of the commission and availed only 50% Cenvat credit. The tribunal acknowledged the appellant's inadvertent payment of service tax and subsequent credit availed. It was clarified that as the service tax was paid on the output service, the appellant could not claim Cenvat credit. Despite this, the tribunal allowed the appellant to pursue a refund for the excess tax paid inadvertently.Refund of service tax paid inadvertently:The tribunal recognized the appellant's genuine error in paying service tax on the commission and granted them the opportunity to seek a refund for the excess tax paid. It was emphasized that there was no malicious intent on the part of the appellant, as they had paid tax on 100% of the commission received.Applicability of penalties:The tribunal found that since the appellant had paid service tax on the entire commission amount and availed partial credit, penalties and demands for an extended period were deemed unsustainable. The penalties imposed by the Adjudicating Authority and upheld by the Commissioner (Appeal) were set aside. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal partly on the grounds of penalties and extended period demands being set aside.In conclusion, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside penalties and demands for an extended period while allowing them to pursue a refund for the excess service tax paid inadvertently. The judgment clarified the liability of service tax on insurance agent services and the entitlement to Cenvat credit in such scenarios.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found