Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deregistration of a separately registered unit could be refused, and refund denied, merely because dues were pending against other separately registered units of the same assessee.
Analysis: The Rules governing capacity determination and collection of duty permit surrender of registration by the assessee and do not make approval of deregistration dependent upon liabilities of some other unit of the same assessee. The unit seeking deregistration was separately registered, and the record showed that no recoverable dues were pending against that unit. The reference to dues of other units was therefore irrelevant. The cited notification also contemplated deregistration where no dues were pending for recovery. In any event, the dues relating to the other units had already been set aside by the higher appellate forums.
Conclusion: The refusal to deregister the unit and the consequential denial of refund were unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue failed to show any infirmity in the appellate orders, and the challenge to the grant of deregistration and refund relief did not succeed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a unit is separately registered and has no outstanding recoverable dues, deregistration cannot be denied on the basis of liabilities attributed to other distinct units of the same assessee.