TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Allahabad: Appeal Allowed, Exempted Services Value Demand Set Aside</h1> The CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order demanding 5% of the value of exempted services. The tribunal found the ... CENVAT Credit - common input/input services used for providing taxable as well as Exempted Services provided by the appellant - case of Revenue is non maintenance of separate records - Held that:- In appellant own case MAGNUM VENTURES LTD. VERSUS C.C.E. GHAZIABAD [2016 (8) TMI 307 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD], Tribunal that appellant is maintaining separate account as required under Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and credit need not be reversed - demand @ 5% of the value of the exempted services is not sustainable - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. The appellate tribunal CESTAT Allahabad ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order demanding 5% of the value of exempted services. The tribunal found that the appellant maintained separate accounts as required by Rule 6(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, based on precedent decisions in the appellant's own case. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
