Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent, being a bona fide purchaser of DEPB licence from the open market, was liable to duty demand or penalty in respect of imports made under such licence.
Analysis: The respondent's purchase of the DEPB licence in the open market was accepted as bona fide. The earlier appellate finding was supported by existing precedent, and the legal position was treated as settled. In that view, no infirmity was found in the order granting relief to the respondent.
Conclusion: The respondent was not liable to duty demand or penalty on the imports made under the DEPB licence, and the appeal was rejected.