TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Classification of touch star fingerprint devices under CTH 8543 7099 upheld by Tribunal</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Customs Bangalore-Cus Versus M/s. Shakya Technologies Ltd</h3> Commissioner of Customs Bangalore-Cus Versus M/s. Shakya Technologies Ltd - 2019 (370) E.L.T. 703 (Tri. - Bang.) Issues:Classification of imported touch star finger print devices under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 8471 9000, 8543 7099, or 8479 9990.Analysis:The appeal involved a dispute regarding the classification of touch star finger print devices imported by M/s. Shakya Technologies Ltd. from Singapore. The respondent claimed a 'Nil' rate of duty under CTH 8471 9000, while the Department classified the items under CTH 8543 7099, charging a duty of 7.5%. Upon appeal, the Commissioner (A) classified the goods under CTH 8479 9990, rejecting the respondent's appeal.The Department argued that the touch star finger print devices operate on electrical/electric technology, making them more appropriately classified under CTH 8543 7099, which covers electrical machines and apparatus with individual functions not specified elsewhere. The Department highlighted Rule 3(c) of the General Rules of Interpretation of Import Tariff, stating that goods should be classified under the heading that occurs last in numerical order among those equally meriting consideration. The Department contended that based on this rule and the nature of the goods, classification under CTH 8543 7099 was justified.The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and examining the records, found that the classification by the Commissioner (A) under CTH 8479 9990 was not suitable. CTH 8479 pertains to machines and mechanical appliances with individual functions not specified elsewhere, such as machinery for buildings, oil seed crushing machines, and industrial robots, which did not align with the nature of the Finger Print Readers. The Tribunal noted that the devices operated on electrical/electric technology, making classification under CTH 8543 7099 more appropriate. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the Department's argument regarding Rule 3(c, emphasizing that the goods should be classified under the heading that occurs last in numerical order among those equally meriting consideration. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the Department's appeal, concluding that the impugned product merited classification under CTH 8543 7099.In conclusion, the Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (A)'s classification and allowed the Department's appeal, determining that the touch star finger print devices should be classified under CTH 8543 7099 due to their operation on electrical/electric technology and in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation of Import Tariff.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
