1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT ALLAHABAD: Adjournment Request Denied, Penalty Set Aside under Central Excise Rules</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD rejected an adjournment request and set aside a penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, ... Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Held that:- The appeals filed by M/s Apollo Metalex Pvt. Ltd. and M/s RRB Chemicals were disposed of by the Tribunal in APOLLO METALEX PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., NOIDA [2015 (10) TMI 960 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] setting aside the demand against the main appellant M/s Apollo Metalex Pvt. Ltd. as also setting aside the penalties on all the persons - penalty set aside - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD rejected an adjournment request and proceeded to decide an appeal regarding a penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The penalty was set aside as the impugned order had already been set aside in a previous Tribunal order.