TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns CIT(A) disallowances, affirms charitable expenses as valid income applications</h1> <h3>KPMG Foundation Versus ITO (Exemption), Faridabad</h3> KPMG Foundation Versus ITO (Exemption), Faridabad - [2018] 68 ITR (Trib) 113 Issues Involved:1. Treatment of donations to various charitable organizations under Section 11(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.2. Enhancement of quantum of disallowance by CIT(A).3. Treatment of donations to government-financed colleges for educational purposes.4. Application of income for other charitable activities like tree plantation, distribution of prizes, etc.5. Treatment of administrative and general expenses as application of income for charitable purposes.Detailed Analysis:1. Treatment of Donations to Various Charitable Organizations:The assessee, a public charitable trust, contested the disallowance of donations amounting to Rs. 69,14,593 made to various charitable organizations registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) held that these donations could not be treated as application of income for charitable purposes under Section 11(1)(a). The Tribunal noted that the donations were supported by documentary evidence and were used for charitable purposes, thus qualifying as application of income under Section 11(1)(a).2. Enhancement of Quantum of Disallowance by CIT(A):The CIT(A) enhanced the disallowance, adding Rs. 85,15,743 to the total disallowed amount. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s reasoning was flawed, particularly in interpreting Section 13(3)(d) and the application of current year's income. The Tribunal emphasized that disallowance under Section 13(3)(d) applies only to accumulated funds, not current income, and cited the Delhi High Court's judgment in the case of Bagri Foundation [192 Taxmann 309].3. Treatment of Donations to Government-Financed Colleges:The CIT(A) disallowed donations of Rs. 36,82,865 made to various government-financed colleges, arguing that these could not be linked to any specific beneficiary and the colleges were not registered under Section 12A. The Tribunal disagreed, noting that the donations were for educational purposes, including scholarships and solar installations, and thus constituted application of income for charitable purposes.4. Application of Income for Other Charitable Activities:The CIT(A) disallowed Rs. 12,59,155 spent on activities like tree plantation, marathon participation, and distribution of prizes among students, claiming they were not charitable. The Tribunal found this reasoning untenable, stating that these activities fell under the category of advancement of general public utility and thus qualified as application of income for charitable purposes.5. Treatment of Administrative and General Expenses:The CIT(A) disallowed Rs. 17,39,164 claimed as administrative and general expenses, arguing that these were not connected to the trust's charitable activities. The Tribunal held that these expenses were necessary for the day-to-day functioning of the trust and were thus legitimate applications of income for charitable purposes.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that all the disallowed expenditures were indeed applications of income for charitable purposes. The entire addition and disallowance made by the CIT(A) were deleted, and the grounds raised by the assessee were allowed. The judgment emphasized that donations in kind, administrative expenses, and contributions to educational and public utility activities are valid applications of income under Section 11(1)(a).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
