Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods seized from the petitioner's business premises under the GST law could be directed to be released on furnishing security or an indemnity bond.
Analysis: The goods had been seized under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act read with Rule 139 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules. The Court granted the State time to file a counter affidavit and, in the meantime, allowed release of the goods on terms designed to secure the alleged tax and penalty liability. The relief was made conditional upon deposit of security other than cash or bank guarantee, or alternatively an indemnity bond, to the satisfaction of the seizing authority.
Conclusion: The petitioner's goods were permitted to be released forthwith on furnishing the stipulated security or indemnity bond.