Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the clearances of the Goa unit, which enjoyed exemption as a rural area unit, could be clubbed with the clearances of the Mumbai unit for computing the aggregate value under the small-scale industry exemption notification.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same issue and read the exemption notification to mean that clearances exempt from the whole of excise duty are to be excluded while determining the aggregate value of clearances. Since the Goa unit had availed the exemption for goods manufactured in a rural area, those clearances could not be added to the Mumbai unit clearances merely because the existence of the Goa unit had not been declared. No valid reason was found to depart from the earlier view.
Conclusion: The clearances of the Goa unit were not liable to be clubbed with the Mumbai unit clearances, and the assessee was entitled to the exemption.
Final Conclusion: The demand, interest, and penalty did not survive, and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Clearances that are exempt from the whole of excise duty must be excluded from the aggregate turnover computation under the exemption notification, and such exempt clearances cannot be clubbed with other unit clearances for denying SSI benefit.