Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand of duty, confiscation of the three pouch packing machines and penalty on the authorised signatory were sustainable when the machines were found uninstalled, no production was being carried on, and the seals were broken.
Analysis: The seized machines were not found in an installed stage and were not ready for production. The panchnama and photographs showed that no raw material or packaging material was loaded in the machines and no manufacturing activity was taking place on them. The scheme of the Pan Masala Packaging Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 applies duty on operating or installed machines, and the deeming fiction for a non-working machine operates only where the machine is installed. The contemporaneous report of installation and sealing showed three machines as uninstalled and sealed. On that basis, the broken seals alone did not establish that the machines had been installed or used for manufacture so as to attract duty, confiscation, or penalty.
Conclusion: The demand of duty, confiscation, and penalty were not sustainable; the appeal of the revenue failed and the order in favour of the assessee was upheld.