1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed for Failure to File Before Commissioner</h1> The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant against an Adjudication Order, ruling it as not maintainable due to the appellant's failure to ... Maintainability of appeal - case of Revenue is that the appellant had not filed any appeal against the Adjudication Order - Held that:- The appellant had agreed with the Order of the Adjudicating authority and no appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals). Therefore, the appeal filed by the appellant before this Tribunal is not maintainable - appeal dismissed as not maintainable. Issues: Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to entertain appeal against Adjudication OrderAnalysis:The case involved the appellant engaged in providing taxable service under the Rent-a-cab Scheme Operator Service category. A Show Cause Notice was issued proposing a demand for Service Tax, interest, and penalty. The Adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of Service Tax along with interest and imposed a penalty, giving the option to pay penalty at 25% of the tax under the proviso to Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Revenue appealed before the Commissioner (Appeals) seeking confirmation of the entire dues and appropriation of the amount already deposited by the appellant towards the Service Tax liability. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue, leading to the appellant filing an appeal against this decision.During the hearing, the Learned Authorized Representative for the Revenue raised a preliminary objection that the appellant had not filed an appeal against the Adjudication Order, making the appeal before the Tribunal not maintainable. The Tribunal agreed with this submission, noting that the appellant had agreed with the Adjudication Order and did not file an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). As a result, the appeal filed by the appellant before the Tribunal was deemed not maintainable and was dismissed on this ground. The operative part of the order was already pronounced in court, concluding the matter based on the lack of maintainability of the appeal before the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
