1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court rules sum received as donation by Siddhartha Publications not taxable</h1> The High Court held that the sum received by M/s. Siddhartha publications (P.) Ltd. from 'Worldwide Partnership' was a casual and non-recurring receipt, ... Depreciation Issues Involved: The judgment involves determining whether a sum received by the assessee from an organization should be considered a revenue receipt liable for assessment.Summary:The case involved a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning M/s. Siddhartha publications (P.) Ltd., a private limited company under winding-up proceedings. The company published a magazine and sought financial assistance from 'Worldwide Partnership.' The organization decided to donate a sum of Rs. 28,342 to the company to help improve the magazine's quality and circulation. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) deemed this amount taxable, but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) considered it a casual and non-recurring receipt. The Tribunal, however, viewed the donation as a business receipt subject to income tax.Decision on the Issue:The High Court disagreed with the Tribunal's decision, stating that the amount received was casual and non-recurring, dependent on the donor's discretion. The Court emphasized that the payment was not a trade receipt but a donation, as the organization intended to help the company without any commercial arrangement. Referring to relevant case law, the Court concluded that the sum in question did not qualify as a business receipt and should not be subject to income tax. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the amount was not a revenue receipt for assessment purposes.