Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>GST Ruling: Exemption for Marg Sudharan Shulk, 18% Tax on Abhivahan Shulk</h1> <h3>In Re : Divisional Forest Officer, Dehradun</h3> The ruling concluded that GST was not applicable on 'Marg Sudharan Shulk' as it resembled toll charges for road maintenance, which are exempted under GST. ... Levy of GST - Marg Sudharan Shulk and Abhivahan Shulk - Whether GST is leviable on the “Marg Sudharan Shulk” and “Abhivahan Shulk” charged by Forest Division Dehradun from the non government, private and commercial vehicles engaged in mining work in lieu of use of forest road? - Held that:- Under GST, “the services by way of assess to a road or a bridge on payment of toll charges” are included in the list of exempted services - the said “marg sudharan shulk” is nothing but toll charges collected by the applicant from the users for using forest road and the said toll charges are being used for the maintenance of forest road - no GST is leviable as on date on the said “marg sudharan shulk” charged and collected by the applicant. GST on Abhivahan Shulk - Held that:- The said “Abhivahan Shulk” is charged and collected by applicant in respect of forest produce carried out by a person - The said “Abhivahan Shulk” can not be termed as toll tax and rather is a form of consideration received by the applicant in lieu of services provided to the person for carrying forest produce - Since the services provided by the applicant do not find mention in the list of exempted services, therefore the applicant is liable to pay GST @ 18% on the said “Abhivahan Shulk” under Service Code 9997 and to be treated as “other services”. Ruling:- no GST is leviable as on date on the said “marg sudharan shulk” charged and collected by the applicant - the applicant is liable to pay GST @ 18% on the said “Abhivahan Shulk” under Service Code 9997 and to be treated as “other services”. Issues:Leviability of GST on 'Marg Sudharan Shulk' and 'Abhivahan Shulk' charged by Forest Division Dehradun from non-government, private, and commercial vehicles engaged in mining work.Analysis:The application under Section 97 of the CGST Act seeks an advance ruling on the GST levied on 'Marg Sudharan Shulk' and 'Abhivahan Shulk' collected by Forest Division Dehradun from vehicles involved in mining activities on forest roads. Advance Ruling under GST pertains to decisions provided by the authority on matters related to the supply of goods or services. The applicant sought clarity on the determination of tax liability on the mentioned charges, falling under Section 97(2)(e) of the CGST/SGST Act, leading to the admission of the application.The applicant was granted a personal hearing, where the nature of work undertaken was described. Despite the absence of any representation from the Revenue side, the applicant's case was considered. The applicant specifically requested an advance ruling on the GST applicability concerning 'Marg Sudharan Shulk' and 'Abhivahan Shulk.'Regarding 'Marg Sudharan Shulk,' it was observed that the charges collected for the use of forest roads were akin to toll charges, which are exempted under GST for services related to access to roads or bridges. As the purpose of 'Marg Sudharan Shulk' was for the maintenance of forest roads, it was concluded that no GST was leviable on these charges.In the case of 'Abhivahan Shulk,' it was noted that these charges were collected for transporting forest produce and were not akin to toll taxes. The charges varied based on the quality and quantity of the forest produce being transported, and were considered as consideration for services provided in carrying the forest produce. As these services did not fall under exempted categories, GST at 18% under Service Code 9997 was deemed applicable on 'Abhivahan Shulk' as 'other services.'In conclusion, the ruling determined that while GST was not leviable on 'Marg Sudharan Shulk' due to its nature resembling toll charges for road maintenance, GST at 18% was applicable on 'Abhivahan Shulk' collected for transporting forest produce as a consideration for services provided.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found