Tribunal upholds late fee for TDS statement delay under section 234E

The Tribunal dismissed all appeals by the assessee challenging the imposition of late fees under section 234E of the I.T. Act for delayed filing of TDS statements. The delay in filing the appeals was considered unjustified, and the non-maintainability of the appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld. The Tribunal confirmed the Ld. CIT(A)'s order, citing legal provisions and emphasizing that the late fee orders were served online, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.

---

---

Issues:
Appeals against order of levying late fees under section 234E of the I.T. Act for late furnishing of TDS statements for different quarters in A.Ys. 2014-2015 and 2015-2016.

Analysis:
The appeals were delayed, with a delay of 686 to 860 days, and the assessee claimed they were not aware of the late fee imposition until a notice of outstanding demand was received. The assessee approached the authority for certified copies of the order, which were downloaded online and appeals filed immediately. However, the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeals as time-barred, stating that the late fee orders were served online and the delay was not beyond the assessee's control. The Ld. CIT(A) cited case laws emphasizing that sufficient cause for delay must be beyond the petitioner's control. The appeals were dismissed on grounds of delay and non-maintainability due to the nature of the demand under section 234E.

The provision of Section 234E of the I.T. Act mandates a fee for late furnishing of statements, applicable when a person fails to deliver statements within the prescribed time. The late fees were imposed for delayed filing of quarterly TDS statements, and the Ld. CIT(A) correctly noted that the orders were served online. The appeals were dismissed as time-barred, with no sufficient cause explained for the delay. The Ld. CIT(A) held that appeals were not maintainable before him, citing the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. Since the orders were not appealable before the Ld. CIT(A), there was no requirement for separate service of the orders upon the assessee. Consequently, the appeals were not maintainable before the Tribunal, and the Ld. CIT(A)'s order was confirmed, dismissing all the appeals.

In conclusion, all the appeals by the assessee against the order of levying late fees under section 234E of the I.T. Act were dismissed by the Tribunal. The delay in filing the appeals was deemed unjustified, and the non-maintainability of the appeals before the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld. The imposition of late fees for delayed filing of TDS statements was found to be in accordance with the law, and the dismissal of the appeals was upheld based on the legal provisions and the findings of the Ld. CIT(A).

---