Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether goods exported on 13.6.2008 were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 77/2008-Cus. (ii) Whether the Revenue could raise, for the first time before the Tribunal, the objection that the shipping-bill assessments had not been challenged.
Issue (i): Whether goods exported on 13.6.2008 were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 77/2008-Cus.
Analysis: The exemption notification was held to operate from the commencement of the date of its issue. The relevant exports had obtained Let Export Order on 13.6.2008, and the Tribunal followed its earlier view that the notification covered exports made on that date, making the duty earlier paid refundable.
Conclusion: The goods exported on 13.6.2008 were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 77/2008-Cus.
Issue (ii): Whether the Revenue could raise, for the first time before the Tribunal, the objection that the shipping-bill assessments had not been challenged.
Analysis: The objection was not taken before the lower authority and was raised only at the second appellate stage. The Tribunal held that a fresh ground of this nature cannot be introduced for the first time before it.
Conclusion: The Revenue could not raise the objection at the Tribunal stage.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on both the exemption question and the attempted new objection, leaving the refund claim intact.
Ratio Decidendi: A withdrawal of export duty by a notification effective from the date of issue applies to exports completed on that date, and a new ground challenging assessment cannot be raised for the first time in second appeal.