TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to abatement and refund of duty for the closure period from 01.06.2013 to 07.06.2013 under the Pan Masala Packing Machine (Collection of Duty and Determination of Capacity) Rules, 2008 read with Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The factory had commenced production only a few days earlier and remained closed for 7 days in June 2013. The dispute turned on whether such closure disentitled the assessee from proportionate abatement because the period was less than 15 days. The Tribunal applied the principle that, under the compounded levy scheme, duty is relatable to actual working of the machine and that when the factory or machine remains non-operational for a period covered by the scheme, duty cannot be retained for that period merely because the closure does not constitute a separate 15-day stretch in isolation. The Tribunal found the facts covered by the earlier Division Bench ruling relied upon by the assessee and held that the excess duty and consequential excess interest paid for the closure period were refundable.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to abatement and refund for the closure period from 01.06.2013 to 07.06.2013, and the rejection of refund on that count was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, and the assessee obtained refund relief with consequential recalculation of interest.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the compounded levy scheme for pan masala packing machines, duty is not payable for a period during which the factory or machine remained non-operational and proportionate abatement cannot be denied merely on a narrow construction divorced from the actual closure period covered by the scheme.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
