Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deduction under section 54F of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was available where the flats were completed before the registered sale deeds of the original capital asset, and whether an agreement to sell could be treated as the date of transfer for that purpose.
Analysis: Section 54F allows exemption only where the assessee, after the date of transfer of the original capital asset, purchases or constructs a residential house within the prescribed period. The Court held that an agreement to sell of immovable property does not, by itself, transfer title or complete the transfer of the capital asset; such transfer occurs on execution and registration of the sale deed. Though section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 gives an extended meaning to "transfer", that width does not mean that a mere agreement to sell, without more, always amounts to transfer of the property itself. The authorities relied on by the assessee were distinguished on their facts, and the Court held that the construction completed before the sale deeds could not qualify for exemption for those flats whose sale deeds were executed after completion.
Conclusion: Deduction under section 54F was allowable only for the flat whose sale deed was executed before completion of construction. For the remaining flats, the claim failed.