Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (4) TMI 1205 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT decision: Partial allowance, deletion of excessive disallowance, TDS credit, transfer pricing upheld, mark to market loss. The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to delete the excessive disallowance under rule 8D(2)(iii) and sustain it at Rs. ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT decision: Partial allowance, deletion of excessive disallowance, TDS credit, transfer pricing upheld, mark to market loss.

                            The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the AO to delete the excessive disallowance under rule 8D(2)(iii) and sustain it at Rs. 50,000. The ITAT remanded the issue of unreconciled income for further examination due to lack of detailed reconciliation. Regarding the addition based on the TDS certificate, the ITAT instructed the AO to grant corresponding TDS credit to the assessee. The ITAT upheld the transfer pricing adjustment addition as the justification provided by the assessee lacked evidential support. Additionally, the ITAT allowed the claim for mark to market loss of forward contracts based on revaluation of export receivables.




                            Issues:
                            1. Disallowance made u/s.14A of the Act.
                            2. Addition of Rs. 1,74,090/- on account of unreconciled income from ITS record.
                            3. Addition of income based on TDS certificate.
                            4. Transfer pricing adjustment.
                            5. Disallowance of mark to market loss of forward derivate contracts.

                            Issue 1 - Disallowance u/s.14A:
                            The Assessing Officer disallowed Rs. 4,55,191/- under rule 8D for the assessee's dividend income of Rs. 550 lakhs, even though the assessee voluntarily disallowed Rs. 50,000. The CIT(A) upheld this. However, the ITAT found the disallowance excessive due to the substantial own funds of the assessee compared to investments. Relying on a Bombay High Court decision, the ITAT directed the AO to delete the disallowance under rule 8D(2)(iii) and sustain the disallowance at Rs. 50,000.

                            Issue 2 - Unreconciled Income from ITS Record:
                            The AO added Rs. 1,74,090 based on discrepancies between the assessee's accounts and the ITS record. The assessee attributed the difference to accrued interest receivable from banks, but failed to provide detailed reconciliation. The ITAT found the lack of details concerning and remanded the issue to the AO for further examination based on the explanation provided by the assessee.

                            Issue 3 - Addition Based on TDS Certificate:
                            An addition of Rs. 1,24,282 was made due to a mismatch between the income booked by the assessee and the TDS certificate. The ITAT directed the AO to give corresponding TDS credit to the assessee, accepting the alternative contention presented by the assessee.

                            Issue 4 - Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
                            The TPO proposed an addition of Rs. 1,82,598 due to the assessee not charging interest on advances to its AE. The ITAT found the assessee's justification lacking evidential support, as no material substantiated the claim of marketing efforts by the AE. Consequently, the ITAT upheld the addition made by the CIT(A) on account of TP adjustment.

                            Issue 5 - Disallowance of Mark to Market Loss:
                            The ITAT allowed the claim for mark to market loss of forward contracts as the underlying assets, export receivables, were revalued and income was offered to tax. Relying on legal precedents, the ITAT directed the AO to allow the claim of the assessee.

                            In conclusion, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, addressing each issue comprehensively and providing detailed reasoning for its decisions.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found