Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (4) TMI 1078 - SC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Income from Sikkim State Lottery taxed under Sikkim rules if tax paid at source; central IT Act not applicable here. Income arising from lottery winnings obtained in Sikkim but remitted to the resident assessees home state is subject to the territorial tax regime of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Income from Sikkim State Lottery taxed under Sikkim rules if tax paid at source; central IT Act not applicable here.

                          Income arising from lottery winnings obtained in Sikkim but remitted to the resident assessees home state is subject to the territorial tax regime of Sikkim rather than the central Income Tax Act when Sikkim law applies and tax is paid at source under Sikkim rules; consequently the same income will not be taxable again under the IT Act for that assessment year. The question whether deduction under section 80TT applies to net or gross winnings is rendered academic by the determination that the income was taxed under the Sikkim State Income Tax Rules and excluded from taxation under the IT Act in the relevant year.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Taxability of income from Sikkim State Lottery under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Applicability of deduction under Section 80TT of the Income Tax Act on 'gross income' or 'net income'.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Taxability of Income from Sikkim State Lottery under the Income Tax Act, 1961:

                          The primary issue in this case was whether the income from the Sikkim State Lottery, earned by the appellant, a resident of Rajasthan, was taxable under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act), especially since the income was already taxed under the Sikkim State Income Tax Rules, 1948. The appellant contended that the IT Act was extended to Sikkim only from 01.04.1989, and hence, income accrued in Sikkim before this date could not be taxed under the IT Act. The appellant also argued that Article 371F of the Constitution, particularly clauses (k) and (n), prevented the application of the IT Act in Sikkim until 31.03.1989, and taxing the same income by both the Union of India and the State of Sikkim would amount to double taxation.

                          The court examined the historical context of Sikkim's merger with India and the introduction of Article 371F, which allowed pre-existing laws in Sikkim to continue until amended or repealed. It was noted that the IT Act was made applicable to Sikkim only by a notification in 1989, with the first assessment year being 1990-91. For the assessment year 1986-87, the IT Act was not applicable in Sikkim, and the Sikkim State Income Tax Rules, 1948, were in force.

                          The court considered Section 5 of the IT Act, which includes all income received or accrued in India within its ambit. However, since the income was earned in Sikkim and already taxed there, the court concluded that the IT Act would not apply, and only the Sikkim State Income Tax Rules, 1948, would be applicable. The court emphasized that double taxation is not permissible unless expressly provided by the legislature, and there was no specific provision in the IT Act to include income from Sikkim lottery tickets before 01.04.1990.

                          2. Applicability of Deduction under Section 80TT on 'Gross Income' or 'Net Income':

                          The second issue was whether the deduction under Section 80TT of the IT Act should be applied to the 'gross income' or the 'net income' from the lottery. The High Court had held that the deduction under Section 80TT should be on the net winning amount received by the assessee after deducting the agent/seller commission.

                          However, since the court concluded that the income from the Sikkim State Lottery was not taxable under the IT Act, this issue became academic. The court did not need to address whether the deduction under Section 80TT should be on the gross or net income, as the primary issue of taxability under the IT Act was resolved in favor of the appellant.

                          Conclusion:

                          In conclusion, the Supreme Court held that the income from the Sikkim State Lottery, already taxed under the Sikkim State Income Tax Rules, 1948, was not taxable under the IT Act, 1961. Consequently, the question of applying the deduction under Section 80TT on gross or net income became irrelevant. The appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the High Court was set aside.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found