Tribunal invalidates reassessment beyond scope of initial reason, dismissing revenue's appeal.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to reopen the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on information indicating income escapement. However, the Tribunal held that the AO exceeded his jurisdiction by making additional inquiries unrelated to the initial reason for reopening, leading to the addition under Section 68 being deemed invalid. The reassessment proceedings were invalidated beyond the original reason for reopening, and the revenue's appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of reopening the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.
2. Scope of reassessment proceedings and the legality of making additional inquiries.
3. Sustaining the addition of Rs. 5,90,00,000 out of Rs. 7,65,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of Reopening the Assessment:
The assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, arguing that it was illegal and bad in law. The Tribunal examined whether the Assessing Officer (AO) had "reasons to believe" that income had escaped assessment. The reopening was based on information from the DGIT (Investigation) indicating that the assessee had obtained accommodation entries of bogus purchase bills amounting to Rs. 9,990 from Symphony Metalam Private Limited. The Tribunal held that the AO had sufficient cause and justification to initiate reassessment proceedings within four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized that at the stage of issuing a notice under Section 148, the AO only needed a prima facie belief of income escapement, not conclusive evidence. Citing the Supreme Court's decision in ACIT Vs Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the AO had rightly initiated reassessment proceedings.

2. Scope of Reassessment Proceedings:
The assessee argued that the AO could not make fishing and roving inquiries beyond the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. The AO had added Rs. 7,65,00,000 under Section 68, which was not related to the initial reason for reopening. The Tribunal noted that Explanation 3 to Section 147, inserted by the Finance Act, 2009, allows the AO to assess any income that comes to his notice during reassessment proceedings, even if it was not part of the original reasons for reopening. However, the Tribunal found that the AO had exceeded his jurisdiction by making inquiries into new issues without any tangible material or information suggesting escapement of income. The Tribunal referred to the Bombay High Court's decision in CIT v. Jet Airways (I) Ltd. and the Delhi High Court's decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. CIT, which held that the AO could not make roving inquiries into unconnected issues. Therefore, the Tribunal ruled that the AO's addition under Section 68 was beyond the scope of reassessment proceedings.

3. Sustaining the Addition under Section 68:
The AO had added Rs. 7,65,00,000 to the assessee's income under Section 68, which the CIT(A) partially upheld by sustaining Rs. 5,90,00,000 and deleting Rs. 1,75,00,000. The Tribunal found that the AO's addition was based on fishing and roving inquiries into the assessee's share application money, share capital, and share premium from 26 parties. The Tribunal held that the AO had no tangible material or information to justify this addition and had exceeded his jurisdiction. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on legal grounds, rendering the question of quantum additions academic.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, ruling that the AO had exceeded his jurisdiction in making additional inquiries and additions under Section 68 without any tangible material. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid beyond the initial reason for reopening. The order was pronounced in the open court on 04th April 2018.

---