Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee university was entitled to approval and exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether denial on the ground of profit motive and the eventual vesting of assets on dissolution was sustainable.
Analysis: The university had been established under the Gujarat Private Universities Act, 2009 and its functioning, administration, winding up, and dissolution were governed by that statute. The financial statements and objects on record showed that the institution was created to impart education and to serve specified educational purposes. The mere fact that the sponsoring body had a role in the university's constitution, or that the statute provided for vesting of assets on dissolution, did not by itself establish that the institution existed for profit. The rejection order also failed to properly consider the financial material and the statutory framework applicable to the university.
Conclusion: The university was not established with a profit motive and satisfied the conditions of section 10(23C)(vi). The denial of exemption was unsustainable and the assessee was entitled to approval under the said provision.
Final Conclusion: The order rejecting exemption was set aside and the revenue authority was directed to grant the requested exemption to the university.
Ratio Decidendi: An educational institution cannot be denied approval under section 10(23C)(vi) merely because its sponsoring body has control or because the governing statute provides for vesting of assets on dissolution, where the institution's objects and material on record show that it exists solely for educational purposes and not for profit.