TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court orders removal of petitioner's name from disqualified directors list under Companies Act 2013</h1> <h3>Rajan Goel Versus Union of India And Anr.</h3> The court allowed the writ petition, directing the removal of the petitioner's name from the list of disqualified directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the ... Disqualifying the petitioner as Director in the company - default in submitting returns with regard to the affairs of the said company which was statutorily required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies for a continuous period of three financial years - Held that:- The writ petitioner has stated that on account of differences and disputes with the other Directors, the company had run into difficulty and statutory compliances in the nature of filing of returns with the Registrar of Companies could not be effected. The proceedings between the petitioner and other directors in this regard are stated to be pending before the Original Side as well as criminal court of this court. We are today informed by Ms. Maninder Acharya, ld. ASG, on instructions from Mr. Akshay Makhija, ld. CGSC; Mr. Sanjay Shorey, Director (Legal) for the Union of India and Mr. Rakesh Tiwari, Registrar of Companies that the respondents have verified the above position and accept the stated position regarding the pendency of matters before the Original Side and criminal court of this court. It is also an admitted position that all these companies are active companies even on date. In view of this position, the respondents shall forthwith take steps for removal of the petitioner’s name from the list of disqualified directors. Issues:1. Disqualification of the petitioner as a Director under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 due to default in submitting returns.2. Quashing of the notices dated 6th September, 2017 and 12th September, 2017.3. Pending proceedings between the petitioner and other directors affecting statutory compliances.4. Activation of DIN number of the petitioner.5. Verification and acceptance of the pendency of matters before the Original Side and criminal court.6. Active status of all companies involved.7. Removal of the petitioner from the list of disqualified directors.Analysis:The writ petition was filed by the petitioner, a Director in a company, challenging the disqualification notices issued under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 due to defaults in filing returns for three financial years. The petitioner, also a Director in other companies, sought the quashing of the said notices citing difficulties and disputes with other Directors, affecting statutory compliances. The court had earlier granted interim stay orders on the disqualification notices, resulting in the activation of the petitioner's DIN number.The court was informed that the respondents had verified and accepted the pendency of matters between the petitioner and other directors before the Original Side and criminal court. It was acknowledged that all companies, including the one in question, were still active. Consequently, the respondents agreed to remove the petitioner from the list of disqualified directors. As a result, the court directed the respondents to take immediate steps for the removal of the petitioner's name from the list and to publish the orders on the website, communicating the same to the petitioners within two weeks.In light of the acceptance by the respondents and the active status of the companies involved, the court allowed the writ petition, granting the relief sought by directing the removal of the petitioner's name from the list of disqualified directors.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
