Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing the capital base for standard deduction under the Second Schedule to the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963, the amounts set apart as additional depreciation reserve, provision for taxation, provision for gratuity, and proposed dividend were to be treated as reserves or provisions.
Analysis: The deciding test was whether the amounts, judged by their substance and on a commercial/common-sense view, were available for future use in the business as reserves or were set apart to meet known or immediate liabilities as provisions. The additional depreciation reserve was found to be an amount kept apart over and above normal depreciation for use in the business in future, and therefore partook of the character of a reserve. The provision for taxation was treated as a liability and not as a reserve, since it was not shown to be an excess provision. The provision for gratuity, made under a regular gratuity scheme, was held to be meant for immediate business contingencies and not for future use in the business. The proposed dividend was likewise regarded as a sum earmarked for an imminent known obligation and not as a reserve.
Conclusion: The additional depreciation reserve was includible in the capital base, while the provision for taxation, provision for gratuity, and proposed dividend were rightly excluded.