Free physician samples valuation follows comparable goods method under Rule 4, not captive consumption valuation under Rule 8.

Physician samples cleared free of cost are not sold at the time and place of removal and therefore have no transaction value under Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Because Rule 8 applies only to goods captively consumed in the manufacture of other articles, it does not govern free distribution samples. Rule 4, read with Rule 11, is the proper basis where the samples are comparable or identical to goods sold in the market, and a reasonable valuation method consistent with the Rules may be adopted. The samples are therefore valued under Rule 4 read with Rule 11, not Rule 8 read with Rule 11.

---

---

Issues: Whether physician samples cleared free of cost for distribution to doctors are to be valued under Rule 4 read with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000, or under Rule 8 read with Rule 11 of those Rules.

Analysis: The physician samples were not sold at the time and place of removal and had no transaction value. The valuation therefore fell under Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Rule 8 was inapplicable because it governs goods not sold but used or consumed captively in the manufacture of other articles, whereas physician samples are cleared for free distribution and are not captively consumed. Rule 4, being the general valuation rule, applies to goods not sold at removal but similar to goods sold at or near the time of removal, and the samples were held to be comparable or identical to the goods sold in the market. Rule 11 permitted adoption of a reasonable method consistent with the Rules, and Rule 4 provided the appropriate basis. The prior reliance on older valuation rules and contrary authorities did not displace this approach.

Conclusion: Physician samples cleared free of cost are correctly valued under Rule 4 read with Rule 11, and not under Rule 8 read with Rule 11, of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000; the issue is answered against the assessee and in favour of Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: Where excisable goods are not sold at removal but are identical or comparable to goods sold in the market, their value may be determined under the general valuation rule on the basis of comparable goods, and Rule 8 is confined to captive consumption in manufacture of other articles.

---