TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions after condoning the delay.</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions after condoning the delay. - TMI Treating the receipts from the lease of its hotel - business income OR house property income - Held that:- SLP dismissed. HC order confirmed [2017 (8) TMI 193 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT]. HC has correctly observed that the business was handed over by the respondent assessee to KHIL in the year 1994 and since the assessment year 1995-96 till the assessment year 2005-06, the income from the same was assessed as a business income. The assessment for the year 1995-96 was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. So also, for the assessment year 2003-04 and assessment year 2005-06, the assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The claim of the assessee of the said income being a business income was accepted. The assessee is not receiving any rent amount but is receiving 1% of the total revenue earned by KHIL and does not get any fix amount as rent. These aspects are considered by the Tribunal. - Decided against revenue. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions after condoning the delay. (Citation: 2018 (3) TMI 1041 - SC)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
