Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal overturns credit denial for input services, citing lack of centralized billing system.</h1> <h3>M/s. Titan Industries Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai</h3> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order disallowing credit on various input services and citing the lack of a centralized ... CENVAT credit - whether the appellant is eligible for credit on the various input services like Mandap Keeper Service, Real Estate Agent Service, Transport of Goods by Air Service, Programme Producer Service, Event Management Service etc.? - Held that: - The period involved is prior to 1.4.2011 when the definition of input services had a wide ambit as it included the words activities relating to business - The Hon ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Coca Cola India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune [2009 (8) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] has analysed the implication of the term within the definition of input services and has held that almost all activities relating to the business of the assessee would fall within the ambit of input service - the denial of credit alleging that these services do not qualify for input service is unjustified. CENVAT credit - denial on the ground that appellant though has a centralized registration but does not have centralized billing system - Held that: - The credit was availed at Hosur on the input services which have been availed at the various service centres since the appellant has obtained centralized registration for credit - the denial of credit on this ground cannot sustain. Time limitation - Held that: - The appellant has furnished necessary details of credit availed along with ST 3 returns. The documents produced show acknowledgement by the department. This clearly evidences that the appellant has not suppressed facts regarding the availment of credit on input services - the SCN issued invoking extended period cannot sustain. Appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. Issues:1. Eligibility of credit on various input services.2. Centralized billing system and credit availed on services utilized in other service centers.3. Grounds of limitation for the show cause notice.Eligibility of Credit on Various Input Services:The appellant, engaged in maintenance and repair services, availed credit on input services like Mandap Keeper Service, Real Estate Agent Service, Transport of Goods by Air Service, and others. The appellant argued that any activity related to its business is eligible for credit, citing the definition of input services prior to 1.4.2011. Referring to a High Court judgment, it was held that denial of credit on the basis that these services do not qualify as input services is unjustified.Centralized Billing System and Credit Availed on Services Utilized in Other Service Centers:The appellant, despite having centralized registration without a centralized billing system, maintained that it had a centralized billing system and was availing credit on services used in other service centers at Hosur. It was noted that during the relevant period, there was no provision for Input Service Distributor (ISD) registration. The Tribunal held that denial of credit on this ground was unsustainable, especially since the department had accepted a precedent where credit was allowed even if services were utilized in different units of the appellant.Grounds of Limitation for the Show Cause Notice:The appellant argued on the ground of limitation, stating that necessary details of credit availed were furnished along with ST 3 returns, and the department had acknowledged these details. It was concluded that the show cause notice invoking the extended period alleging suppression of facts was not sustainable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the ground of limitation as well.In conclusion, the impugned order disallowing credit on various input services and citing lack of centralized billing system was set aside both on merits and limitation grounds. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found