Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows deduction for completed project despite another not commencing</h1> The Tribunal allowed a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for completed units in project 'A', despite project 'B' not commencing. The Tribunal ... Deduction u/s.80IB(10) eligibility - Held that:- The assessee is entitled for deduction on proportionate basis. However, it is the decision of the Tribunal that AO needs to verify on the aspects narrated in the order of the Tribunal. Considering the settled nature of the issue, we are of the opinion that assessee is entitled to proportion deduction u/s.80IB(1) of the Act in view of the directions given by the Tribunal in the assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2010-11. We therefore direct the AO accordingly. Thus, the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue are dismissed. Issues Involved:1. Allowability of deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Proportionate deduction for completed units of a housing project.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Allowability of Deduction under Section 80IB(10):The primary issue in this appeal is the allowability of deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, an Association of Persons (AOP) engaged in the business of Builders and Developers, filed a return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 3,22,31,984 and claimed a deduction of Rs. 3,75,97,564 for units sold in buildings A1 to A6, part of project 'A'. The construction of these buildings was claimed to be completed before the due date of 31.03.2008. However, the initial plan included two projects, 'A' and 'B', and since project 'B' had not started, the deduction was denied for the Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2009-10 and 2010-11 by the Assessing Officer (AO). The CIT(A) confirmed this denial. The Tribunal, in the assessee's appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11, allowed a proportionate claim of deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed units in project 'A'.2. Proportionate Deduction for Completed Units:The Tribunal's previous orders for A.Y. 2009-10 and 2010-11 were pivotal in this case. The Tribunal had allowed proportionate deductions for completed units in project 'A', even though project 'B' had not commenced. The Tribunal considered the factual aspects, such as the purchase of land, statutory provisions under the Urban Land Ceiling & Regulation Act, 1976 (ULCA), and the various commencement certificates issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). The Tribunal noted that the construction and development of project 'A' could only commence after the clear area of 12094 sq. meters was available post the ULCA order dated 22.12.1998. The Tribunal held that the plans approved on 09.06.1999 were subject to ULCA conditions, and the actual commencement certificate was issued on 17.04.2004. The Tribunal concluded that the project 'A' was to be considered approved on 09.06.1999, and the construction had to be completed by 31.03.2008.The Tribunal directed the AO to verify whether the building in project 'A' was completed by 31.03.2008. If completed, the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IB(10). If not, the assessee was entitled to a proportionate deduction for the completed units. The Tribunal dismissed the AO's argument that the project 'B' not being completed would affect the deduction for project 'A', as the land for project 'B' was under ULCA until 21.10.2005.In the present appeal for A.Y. 2011-12, the assessee claimed the same deduction. The Tribunal reiterated its previous findings, directing the AO to allow proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed units in project 'A', following the same reasoning as in the earlier years.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is entitled to a proportionate deduction under section 80IB(10) for the completed units in project 'A'. The AO was directed to verify the completion status as per the Tribunal's directions. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)'s order allowing the deduction. The order was pronounced on 28th February 2018.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found