Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (3) TMI 118 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Arbitration does not bar security enforcement, and a successor company may invoke the Act after amalgamation. Initiation of arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not bar recourse to the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Arbitration does not bar security enforcement, and a successor company may invoke the Act after amalgamation.

                            Initiation of arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not bar recourse to the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, because the security enforcement regime is an additional, complementary remedy for realisation of secured assets. After amalgamation, the transferee company as successor-in-interest may invoke the Act for pre-existing debts where the transferor's loans, security documents, rights and liabilities have vested in it. The statute operates retroactively in relation to existing debts and security interests, and the change in enforcement forum is procedural rather than substantive.




                            Issues: (i) Whether initiation of arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 barred recourse to proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. (ii) Whether, after amalgamation, the transferee company as successor-in-interest could invoke the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in respect of loans originally advanced by an entity that was not then a secured creditor under that Act.

                            Issue (i): Whether initiation of arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 barred recourse to proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

                            Analysis: The special recovery regime under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 operates in addition to, and not in derogation of, other remedies. The existence of arbitration proceedings does not attract the doctrine of election because enforcement under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is a distinct statutory remedy for realization of secured assets. The two enactments are complementary, and the invocation of arbitration did not foreclose action under the security enforcement statute.

                            Conclusion: The answer is against the borrowers and in favour of the appellant; arbitration proceedings did not bar recourse to the security enforcement .

                            Issue (ii): Whether, after amalgamation, the transferee company as successor-in-interest could invoke the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in respect of loans originally advanced by an entity that was not then a secured creditor under that Act.

                            Analysis: On sanction of the amalgamation scheme under the Companies Act, the loans, security documents, rights and liabilities of the transferor vested in the transferee company. The Act was held to be retroactive in operation in the sense that it applies to pre-existing debts and existing security interests once the statute or notification brings the lender within its sweep. The borrower's status and the security arrangement are determined with reference to the legal position after such vesting, and the change of forum for enforcement is procedural rather than substantive. The transferor's inability at the earlier point of time did not prevent the successor, now a secured creditor, from enforcing the security interest.

                            Conclusion: The answer is against the borrowers and in favour of the appellant; the transferee company could validly invoke the Act as successor-in-interest.

                            Final Conclusion: The impugned judgment was unsustainable because the security enforcement statute applied to the existing debt after amalgamation, and its use was not barred by prior arbitration steps. The borrower's challenge failed and the security enforcement measures were restored.

                            Ratio Decidendi: The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 provides an additional and complementary enforcement remedy, and as a retroactive procedural statute it can be invoked for pre-existing debts by a successor-in-interest after a lawful amalgamation and vesting of the secured asset and debt.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found