Banking regulation and State debt relief laws: Union banking power stands, but special agricultural debt relief prevails on conflict.

Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act was treated as a valid Union law under Entry 45, List I because banking includes lending and recovery as incidental aspects, and the provision formed part of a banking regulatory scheme. However, in States where Debt Relief legislation covers agricultural indebtedness to banks, that special State field under Entry 30, List II prevails to the extent of direct conflict. The non obstante clause in Section 21A could not displace State law within that exclusive sphere, although the provision continued to operate where no such State debt relief law applied to bank loans.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 is within Parliament's legislative competence under Entry 45, List I, and therefore valid; (ii) Whether Section 21A can operate against State Debt Relief legislation in relation to relief of agricultural indebtedness, including debts due to banks.

Issue (i): Whether Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 is within Parliament's legislative competence under Entry 45, List I, and therefore valid.

Analysis: The expression "banking" in Entry 45, List I was given a wide meaning, extending to all aspects incidental or ancillary to banking, including lending and recovery of debts by banks. Section 21A, which prohibits reopening of banking transactions on the ground of excessive interest, was treated as an integral part of a statute dealing with banking regulation. Applying pith and substance, the Act as a whole fell within the Union field, even though one provision incidentally touched a State subject.

Conclusion: Section 21A is valid and falls within Parliament's competence under Entry 45, List I.

Issue (ii): Whether Section 21A can operate against State Debt Relief legislation in relation to relief of agricultural indebtedness, including debts due to banks.

Analysis: Entry 30, List II was construed broadly as a distinct and special head covering relief of agricultural indebtedness, not confined to moneylenders alone. The Court held that this special State field must be harmonised with the general Union entry on banking. Where State Debt Relief Acts cover agricultural debts due to banks, Section 21A only incidentally trenches upon the State field and must yield to the extent of the clash. The non obstante clause in Section 21A cannot override State legislation enacted within the States' exclusive sphere. At the same time, where no State Debt Relief Act applies to banks, Section 21A continues to operate.

Conclusion: Section 21A does not operate against State Debt Relief Acts insofar as they cover agricultural indebtedness to banks; otherwise, it remains effective.

Final Conclusion: The provision was upheld in principle, but its operation was confined to avoid conflict with State laws on agricultural debt relief in States where such laws extend to bank loans.

Ratio Decidendi: A Union law on banking valid under Entry 45, List I will still yield to a special State law on relief of agricultural indebtedness under Entry 30, List II to the extent of direct conflict, because incidental encroachment cannot displace an exclusive State field absent constitutional supremacy for Parliament in that field.

---