GTA service tax abatement upheld where general transporter declarations satisfied exemption conditions without separate consignment note endorsements.

GTA service tax abatement under the exemption notifications could not be denied merely because each consignment note lacked a specific endorsement, where the transporter had given general declarations confirming compliance with the prescribed conditions. The Board's clarifications and later circulars recognised that such undertakings were sufficient in past cases, and a stricter proof requirement could not be imposed beyond the notification itself. On that basis, the appellant's entitlement to abatement was upheld, and the departmental demand and penalties were not sustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to abatement under the GTA service tax exemption notifications on the basis of general declarations from the transporters, despite the absence of a specific endorsement on each consignment note, and whether the departmental demand and penalties could be sustained.

Analysis: The exemption scheme initially limited tax to 25% of the gross freight and required the GTA not to have availed CENVAT credit or the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The Board's clarifications recognised that, for consignor or consignee liable to pay tax on GTA services, a declaration from the GTA that the prescribed conditions were fulfilled would suffice. Later circulars further clarified that, in past cases, the benefit of abatement could be extended on production of a general declaration from the GTA, without insisting on endorsements in each consignment note. The appellant had obtained such undertaking letters from the transporters. The circular-based insistence on a stricter proof requirement was therefore beyond the notification and could not be used to deny the exemption benefit.

Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the abatement, and the demand as well as the penalties could not be sustained.

---