Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessees, who had not produced the agreement copies before completion of assessment under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, were entitled to a further opportunity to file authenticated records and have the assessments reconsidered on payment of part of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The assessment orders had been passed after the assessees failed to respond to the notices and did not produce the requested agreement copies. At the same time, the record indicated that the assessees had undertaken substantial work for Government bodies and possessed other authenticated records from the concerned authorities. In that situation, the Court found that such records could be examined for verifying the correctness of the reported turnover. To balance the lapse on the part of the assessees with the need to examine the claims on merits, the Court imposed a condition that they pay 15% of the disputed tax for each assessment year within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The assessees were granted a conditional opportunity to treat the assessment orders as show cause notices, file objections, produce authenticated documents, and secure reconsideration of the assessments on merits; failing compliance, the writ petitions would stand dismissed automatically.