Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was sustainable when the show-cause notice did not specify whether the proceedings were for concealment of particulars of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.
Analysis: The penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was found to be ambiguous because it mentioned both limbs of the provision without striking off the inapplicable portion. The penalty order also proceeded on both grounds. In such circumstances, the assessee was not put on clear notice of the exact charge, and the defect went to the root of the validity of the penalty proceedings. The decision was supported by the cited precedents holding that a vague notice of this nature renders the penalty unsustainable.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable in law and was deleted in favour of the assessee.