Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the services rendered to financial institutions by the service provider were liable to service tax as Business Auxiliary Service and, if so, whether they were excluded from exemption as branded services under Notification No. 06/2005-ST dated 01/03/2005.
Analysis: The services were held to fall within the scope of Business Auxiliary Service and were otherwise taxable under that category. However, the services were rendered to the financial institutions themselves, so the question of the service provider using the brand of those institutions did not arise. On that basis, the services were not treated as branded services, and the exemption under Notification No. 06/2005-ST dated 01/03/2005 was held to be available.
Conclusion: The exemption was held admissible and the matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for grant of the exemption and re-determination of service tax liability.