Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Penalties Deleted for Assessee Due to Compliance and Reasonable Cause</h1> The Tribunal reviewed appeals against penalty confirmation under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 2006-07 to 2012-13. It found ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - held that:- As per section 271(1)(b) of the Act, the Assessing Officer or the ld. CIT, if satisfied that any person fails to comply with the notice u/s 142(1) of the Act, then a sum of ₹ 10,000/- for each failure has to be levied, In the present case, the assessee having complied with all the notices u/s 142(1) of the Act and there is a reasonable cause u/s 273B of the Act, therefore, no penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of ht Act can be levied. Assessment in the present case has already been completed for the impugned A.Y. u/s 152A r.w.s 143(3) of the Act for assessment year 2006-07 to 2011-12 and u/s 143(3) of the Act for assessment year 2012-13 vide order dated 27.02.2015 has been completed where the additions in different years have been made as is evident from the orders placed at pages 171 to 257 of the ld. CIT(A) against the order of assessment u/s 153A/143(3) dated 28.03.2016. Thus order having been passed u/s 153A/143(3) of the Act we set aside the impugned penalty order and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty. Thus, all the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. Issues:Appeals against confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2006-07 to 2012-13.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Confirmation of Penalty by CIT(A)The appeals were filed against the confirmation of penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment years 2006-07 to 2012-13. The Tribunal noted that the appeals of both assessees were connected, involving identical issues, and thus decided to dispose of them together for convenience.Issue 2: Penalty Imposed for Non-ComplianceIn the specific case of Shri Subhash Sathe for assessment year 2007-08, a penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed under section 271(1)(b) for non-furnishing of information as required under section 142(1) of the Act. The Assessing Officer had issued notices for compliance, and the replies provided by the assessee were deemed inadequate, leading to the penalty imposition.Issue 3: Compliance with NoticesThe Tribunal examined the compliance history of the assessee with the notices issued under section 142(1) of the Act. It was observed that the assessee had responded to the notices within the specified timelines and provided the required information and documents as per the queries raised by the Assessing Officer.Issue 4: Justification for PenaltyThe Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both sides, including the contentions of the assessee regarding the alleged foreign bank account. The Tribunal analyzed the statements recorded during the search operation, where the assessee had initially denied having a foreign account but later acknowledged its existence. The Tribunal found the assessee's explanations unconvincing and upheld the penalty imposition.Issue 5: Tribunal's DecisionAfter a detailed review of the facts, compliance records, and arguments, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) could not be justified in the case of the assessee. The Tribunal highlighted the compliance with notices, reasonable cause under section 273B of the Act, and the completion of assessments for the relevant assessment years. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed on the assessee.Issue 6: Disposal of AppealsThe Tribunal extended its decision on penalty deletion to all connected appeals of both assessees, emphasizing the identical nature of the issues and facts involved. The Tribunal allowed all the grounds raised by the assessees, leading to the allowance of all appeals and the deletion of penalties imposed under section 271(1)(b) for the respective assessment years.This comprehensive analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment, detailing the Tribunal's considerations and ultimate decision regarding the confirmation of penalties under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found