Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellants not liable for service tax pre-2007. Composition scheme applies post-2007. Section 78 penalty revoked. Appeal partly allowed.</h1> The Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax before 1.6.2007 and had fulfilled their tax liability under the composition ... Commercial or Industrial Construction Service - completion and finishing services - period June 2005 to March 2008 - Held that: - Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. [2015 (8) TMI 749 - SUPREME COURT] held that the appellants will not be liable to pay service tax prior to 1.6.2007 - For the period from 31.6.2007 to 31.3.2008, considering the services as works contract service, they would be eligible for composition scheme. The tax liability, after application of composition scheme, has already been discharged by the appellant. Hence there is no further liability that is required to be paid by the appellant. For this reason, there shall be no further tax liability beyond the amount already paid by the appellant - there is no cause for imposition for penalty for which reason the penalty imposed under section 78 is set aside. Appeal allowed in part. Issues:Taxability of completion and finishing services under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service for the period June 2005 to March 2008. Applicability of service tax prior to 1.6.2007. Eligibility for composition scheme for works contract services from 1.6.2007 to 31.3.2008. Discharge of tax liability under composition scheme. Imposition of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.Analysis:1. Taxability of Completion and Finishing Services:The appellants provided completion and finishing services such as acoustic applications, false ceiling, and acoustic panel partition. The Department categorized these services as taxable under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service for the period June 2005 to March 2008. The adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 44,34,115 along with interest and imposed a penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision in the impugned order dated 22.12.2009, leading to the appeal.2. Applicability of Service Tax Prior to 1.6.2007:The appellant argued that based on a Supreme Court judgment in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Kerala Vs. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., they were not liable to pay service tax before 1.6.2007. For the period from 1.6.2007 to 31.3.2008, they claimed to have discharged the tax liability under the Commercial or Industrial Construction Service with a 67% abatement. They contended that as the services provided were works contract, they should benefit from the composition scheme. The appellant had already paid Rs. 1,91,426 for the period June 2007 to March 2008, exceeding the amount required under the composition scheme, but they did not seek a refund of the excess amount paid.3. Eligibility for Composition Scheme and Discharge of Tax Liability:Considering the services as works contract service, the appellants were deemed eligible for the composition scheme. The appellants had already paid more than double the amount required under the composition scheme for the period from 1.6.2007 to 31.3.2008. They expressed no intention to claim a refund of the excess amount paid. Consequently, the tax liability, after applying the composition scheme, had been fulfilled by the appellant, and no further liability was deemed necessary.4. Imposition of Penalty:The Tribunal acknowledged that the entire issue surrounding the tax liability was complex and required clarification from the Apex Court. Given the circumstances, the Tribunal found no justification for imposing a penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and thus set aside the penalty.5. Conclusion:In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not liable to pay service tax before 1.6.2007 and had fulfilled their tax liability under the composition scheme for the period from 1.6.2007 to 31.3.2008. As a result, there was no additional tax liability beyond what had already been paid. The penalty under section 78 was also revoked due to the complexity of the issue. The appeal was partly allowed based on the above findings.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found