Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether delay beyond the extended period prescribed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could be condoned by invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: The revisions were filed beyond the extended period available under the special statute. The Court relied on the statutory scheme and the line of authorities holding that where a special or local law prescribes a definite limitation period with a limited power of condonation, Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act applies only to the extent not expressly excluded. Once the statute fixes an outer limit for condonation, the appellate or revisional authority cannot enlarge that period by resort to Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The precedents cited uniformly supported the view that such special limitation provisions operate as an express exclusion of further condonation beyond the prescribed maximum period.
Conclusion: Delay beyond the extendable period under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was not condonable; the applications for condonation of delay were dismissed and the revisions were rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special fiscal statute prescribes a limitation period with a limited and exhaustive power to condone delay, further extension cannot be granted under Section 5 of the Limitation Act because the special law expressly excludes any wider condonation.