Non-compete fees disallowed as intangible asset for depreciation by Tribunal.

The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fees claimed as an intangible asset by the assessee. The Tribunal ruled that non-compete fees did not qualify as an intangible asset for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) of the Act, contrary to the ld CIT(A)'s decision. Despite the assessee's arguments and references to other court decisions, the Tribunal sided with the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's judgment in a similar case, reversing the CIT(A)'s order and reinstating the Assessing Officer's decision to disallow the depreciation.

---

---

Issues:
- Disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fees claimed as intangible asset

Analysis:
The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld CIT(A) regarding the disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fees claimed as an intangible asset. The assessee, a wholesale trading company, acquired a running business and paid non-compete fees, claiming depreciation under section 32 of the Act. The ld AO disallowed the depreciation, stating that the business was specialized, making it unlikely for other players to enter the market due to its complexity. The ld CIT(A) allowed the claim, leading to the Revenue's appeal.

The ld Departmental Representative argued that the issue was unfavorable to the assessee based on a decision by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. Conversely, the ld AR supported the ld CIT(A)'s order, asserting that non-compete fees qualified as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation. The AR referenced the amendment from the Assessment Year 1999-2000 and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a related case. The AR also pointed out various clauses in the business transfer agreement to support the claim.

Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had acquired the business as a going concern and paid non-compete fees, claiming it as an intangible asset for depreciation. The ld CIT(A) had ruled in favor of the assessee, citing the amendment to the income tax act and defining intangible assets eligible for depreciation. However, the Tribunal found that the issue was decisively settled against the assessee by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's judgment in a similar case. The Tribunal emphasized that non-compete fees did not qualify as an intangible asset for depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. Despite the assessee's reliance on other court decisions, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, reversing the ld CIT(A)'s order and restoring the ld Assessing Officer's decision to disallow depreciation on non-compete fees.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the disallowance of depreciation on non-compete fees claimed as an intangible asset by the assessee.

---